Services · Transport and logistics
Transport and logistics automation
In a transport company, time is not lost behind the wheel. It is lost between the order received and the order allocated, between the delivery made and the proof of it, between the proof and the invoice. We automate those handovers, because they are repetitive and rule-bound. The dispatcher stays the one who decides allocation.
Why this page differs from the others
This is not a service page with the industry name swapped. Transport flows have specifics that do not appear elsewhere: the transport document has legal requirements, proof of delivery arrives from the field and usually from a phone, and the invoice depends on confirming a delivery that happened two days ago in another city.
Where we do not yet have direct experience in a sub-domain, we say so at the audit. We do not build a page that suggests otherwise.
Where the time actually goes
- Orders arrive by email, WhatsApp and phone, in different formats, and are consolidated by hand.
- Allocation is done against a sheet that does not reflect the real current state.
- Transport documents are filled in manually, with data that already exists in the order.
- Proof of delivery arrives as a photo on WhatsApp and is hunted for at invoicing time.
- Invoicing waits for someone to verify what was actually delivered last week.
- The client calls to ask where the goods are, and answering takes two phone calls.
One order, automated
Select a step for detail.
Order received through one intake
Orders from different channels land in one place with the same fields: sender, consignee, goods, deadline, terms. Normalising at intake is the step that makes the rest of the flow possible.
email · form · EDI · spreadsheet
Validated before allocation
Whatever can be checked is: the address exists, the deadline is feasible, the client is not over their credit limit. An order accepted then cancelled costs more than one declined in time.
Allocation proposed, dispatcher decides
The system proposes options based on availability, position and cargo type. The decision stays with the dispatcher, because he knows what the system does not: the relationship with a driver, the real state of a route, what was agreed on the phone.
Documents generated from the order
Transport documents are generated from data already entered, not retyped. Consistent numbering, automatic archiving, no lost versions.
Confirmation from the field
The driver confirms delivery from a phone, with the proof attached. It lands on the order itself, not in a chat thread it has to be dug out of later.
Automatic client notification
The client learns the goods have left and arrived without calling. This is the most visible improvement for your client and the cheapest to implement.
Invoicing on confirmed deliveries
The invoice is prepared from deliveries with proof, not from memory. Anything without confirmation stays flagged and waits, instead of being invoiced wrongly or forgotten.
Reference architecture — not a client result.
What stays human
Allocation in unforeseen situations, negotiating a deadline, the relationship with drivers, deciding when a route is no longer viable.
Automation prepares the information and executes the predictable steps. It does not take over dispatch — it removes data entry from it.
Frequently asked
Do you have transport experience?
INTELEVO is early-stage and we do not yet have delivered projects to show in this field. What we bring is the method: we map your real flow before proposing anything. At the audit we tell you plainly what we know and what we will learn together.
Will it integrate with our transport system?
It depends on the system. Those with an API integrate directly; some allow only import and export; a few are closed. We check at the audit and tell you which category yours falls into.
Do drivers have to learn a new app?
As far as possible, no. Confirmation can go through the channel they already use. A flow that asks the field team to change habits fails, however well built.
If we have five trucks, is it worth it?
The criterion is not the number of trucks but how many times a day someone enters the same data twice. Sometimes it is worth it at five, sometimes not at thirty. The audit establishes which.
Want to find out whether your process is worth automating?
Free initial audit, 60–120 minutes. No obligation to implement. If automation does not make enough economic or operational sense, we will tell you.